Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 005
Original file (2014 005.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2014-005

 

NAME

CURRENT DD-214 Under Honorable Conditions, COMDTINST M1000.4 ART 1-B-12, JKQ,
Misconduct, RE4

RELIEF REQUESTED [| Honorable

RELIEF GRANTED None
BY DRB

ADMIN None
CORRECTIONS

TIS 2 yrs, 5 months, 16 days
Policy Implications None

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

 

 

The applicant was discharged for Misconduct due to Commission of a Serious Offense in 2012. The
applicant’s complete Personnel Data Record and Separation Package were available for the Board to review.

The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The applicant pled guilty to Assault and False
Official Statements at a Summary Court Martial prior to discharge.

The applicant was notified of the intent to discharge, and the applicant was advised of his rights to an attorney,
he made a statement on his behalf and objected to discharge. The applicant was also denied a Second Chance
waiver by the District Admiral due to the laundry list of offenses in a short time period. No new evidence has
been provided by the applicant on his board request.

RECOMMENDATION: The Board members thoroughly reviewed the applicant’s record of service and all

available documentation*. The Board deemed that the applicant’s character of service, reason for separation

and reenlistment code are appropriate and should not be changed. The applicant has not substantiated any error
. 5

or inequity.

Propriety: Discharge was proper.
Equity: Discharge was equitable.
Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: No relief.

 

* Record was received from CGPSC-PSD-mr and includes all documentation that was available after a search of
available records in the Coast Guard personnel records system and augmented by Direct Access record data.

tn reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is
substantial credible evidence (to include evidence submitted by the Applicant) to rebut the presumption.

Similar Decisions

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 074

    Original file (2013 074.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy. RECOMMENDATION: The Board members thoroughly reviewed the applicant’s record of service and all available documentation*.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 040

    Original file (2014 040.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant made false official statements to the Coast Guard Investigative Service (CGIS). The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The applicant was given due process and spoke with an attorney on accepting a more favorable character of service in lieu of a Summary Court-Martial punishment and a subsequent separation.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 026

    Original file (2013 026.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-026 NAME CURRENT DD-214 RELIEF REQUESTED RELIEF GRANTED BY DRB ADMIN CORRECTIONS TIS 13 yrs, 7 months, 8 days Policy Implications _| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Misconduct due to Trial and Conviction with Civil Authorities in 2003. Thereafter in 2003, the Administrative Separation Board convened to review the applicant’s record to determine retention for further service. After the Administrative Separation Board, the...

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 002

    Original file (2014 002.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pursuant to policy, the applicant was recommended for Discharge due to a drug incident. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Per post policy noted in ALCOAST 562/08, a General discharge is no longer considered an official character of service.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 006

    Original file (2013 006.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete Personnel Data Record, Summary Courts-Martial, Pretrial Agreement, and Separation Package were available for the Board to review. The applicant (and attorney brief) states that the victims were reciprocal in the physical contact, text messages, and sexual nature initiated by the applicant. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity on the merits of this case.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 032

    Original file (2013 032.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In early 2012, the applicant’s command initiated Discharge proceedings based on the two alcohol incidents. Furthermore, the applicant mentions no details or mitigating factors about the Felony Battery with no contest plea. Prior to epm’s final approval, the Admiral serving as the local Discharge authority fully endorsed the Discharge due to commission of a serious offense with a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 032

    Original file (2014 032.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NJP results specify that the spouse had suffered a fractured nose and received stitches. The separation package does show an Honorable recommendation from the Sector, but this is due to the pattern of misconduct vice the voluntary plea on the application and supporting statements. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 078

    Original file (2013 078.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-078 NAME CURRENT DD-214 Under Honorable Conditions, COMDTINST M1000.4 ART 1.B.17, JKA, Pattern of Misconduct, RE4 a BY DRB CORRECTIONS TIS 3 yrs, 3 months, 18 days Policy Implications _| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Pattern Of Misconduct due to two Non-Judicial punishments within a 2 year period. Thereafter, the SPO issued an Under Honorable Conditions character of Service. Based on the final approval made by EPM, the...

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 027

    Original file (2014 027.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pursuant to policy, the applicant he was recommended for Discharge due to a drug incident. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 059

    Original file (2013 059.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Therefore, based on the post-separation policy, the Board recommends that the character of service be amended to Under Honorable Conditions. In accordance with ALCOAST 562/08, the character of service be amended to Under Honorable Conditions based on the post- separation policy.